Direct marketing: start with what you know

Over the course of my marketing career, there’s a trend that’s never stopped: data about prospects has gotten easier to obtain and easier to analyze. Segmentation and targeting that were difficult and expensive to do in the past have become cheaper and easier for organizations of all sizes. And what’s most interesting about this is that still, lots of organizations don’t use this data to market more effectively.

A while back, I made a donation to the American Diabetes Association. I did this because I know that diabetes is a serious health problem (though not one that’s affect me or anybody close to me) and because a friend was participating in a fundraiser and asked for sponsors.

It doesn’t surprise me that I got another solicitation from them; I expected that. What did surprise me was how poorly conceived it was, almost as if it was intended to fail. (Which it did.)

(Now, before I go on, I want to be very clear about something: my comments about this mailing should not be seen as a criticism of the ADA’s mission or goals. I don’t know much about them, but I don’t want to discourage anybody who supports them from ceasing to do so. What I do want to do is point out an excellent example of mistakes you should avoid in your own direct marketing.)

Here are some things that the ADA knows about me (and everyone other first-time donor from that fundraiser), without doing any fancy data analysis:

With all that in mind, it’s just amazing to me that I got this in the mail:
ADA direct mail pitch

Does anything here speak to the situation I described? The first thing on the page is “Membership Dues Notice.” Huh? I’m not a member. I’ve never been one, and have no interest in becoming one. Why are they asking me for dues? This is like getting one of those fake bills for domain name hosting.

Then there’s a list of all the benefits I’ll get for $12; but none of these mean anything to me. I’ve never asked for them or used them before. A subscription to a magazine I don’t read? Discounts on supplies I don’t buy? The ability to look at a web site (gee, that’s hard to come by)? Why should I care about any of this?

There’s no reason for me to, of course. It looks like my name has just been tossed onto some house list.

Now, imagine if they had sent something like this to all the people who gave sponsored someone in that fundraiser and who were new donors:

Dear John,

Thanks for supporting Pat in the recent Big Old ADA Fundraiser. Donations from friends and family are a tremendous help in our ongoing efforts to fight diabetes, which is now [insert a compelling statistic about the impact of diabetes here].

This year, our works will include…. [insert list of important initiatives].

That’s why we’d like to ask you to consider extending your support with another donation….

And so on.

All that copy does is take what they already know about a specific group of donors and make an appeal that has some hope of being relevant. It supports the appeal by explaining why the donation is important and how it will be used. Ideally it would be part of a discrete, limited campaign - maybe a couple of letters - to identify the donors who will give again. (Some of them never will, of course, and once the campaign has run, it’s appropriate to stop spending money to reach them.)

And this doesn’t even require any kind of hardcore data analysis, just the very basic step of thinking, “Who are these people on this new list of names? Now that they’ve given once, how can we find the ones who are willing to give again?”

If I saw this kind of mailer from a charity that was something close to my heart, I’d think, “Why are they throwing away money on this?”

If you’re not doing some kind of segmentation in your direct marketing now, you are almost certainly throwing away money - and potential income. This doesn’t require extensive investments in software or data analysis; if you’re doing nothing, just do some very basic cuts at your database and start tailoring messages to the different groups. If you’re a small business, it can be as simple as dividing the list into new contacts, good repeat customers, and occasional customers and speaking to them all appropriately.

It takes some work, but it’s never been easier; there’s no reason to be making mistakes like the letter above.


Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically each day to your feed reader. If you don't have a feed reader, you can always have these articles delivered to your email inbox every day. Click here to sign up.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

No trackbacks/pingbacks yet.

Comments

To this, I would also add “please do not share my name. Ever.”

I had a bad experience with a donation I made to a non-profit when I was in college. As far as I can tell, they just used the funds to sell my name to every other like-minded organization who then proceeded to solicit. And tell their two charity list-shares. And so on. I believe the organization is worthy, but it soon becomes a “Beggars in Spain” situation. (Or, “We have a live one!”)

Since then, I’ve been leery of donating unless there’s an obvious way to opt-out of any future solicitations entirely.
It presents a dilemma when a friend’s just signed up for Big Athletic Event Benefiting Large Charity (MS 150 mile bike rides, ALA stair climbs, etc) and committed to raising funds.

I want to support my friend, but I don’t want to be on Yet Another Mailing List.

Well, one can always hand over cash and say, “Please, you go put the money in anonymously.” But it’s a pain and kills the handy “donate on my web page” features.

Funny - after writing this post, I got the exact same mailing from the ADA, but they had slashed the requested donation from $12 to $9. What’s funny is that when I’m inclined to give, I usually give no less than $25. If they had made the case successfully for that, that’s what I would have given.

The Problem With Direct Marketing Today

John,

I agree with your basic premise, but I don’t think it is clear how the ADA would have been able to make the connection between you and your friend. Be that as it may, you are right on target about segmentation and how we should use data to understand our customers and their future behavior. At very least, this campaign should have segmented new donors from previous donors. You should have been thanked for your contribution, and they should be looking at their new donors to understand where their growth or new business is coming from in order to test ways to become relevant to you. The problem that I see with direct marketing today is that the industry is not geared to building smaller segments and to taking advantage of technologies like variable text and data mining.

The big direct marketing companies want to use direct mail as if it is a mass media. They are not interested in creating smaller segments and developing longitudinal campaigns. Why? For two reasons, first these more complex campaigns take a skilled marketer to design and manage the entire process. The second reason is that they don’t know how to charge for these new services. What the big boys want to do is what they have done in the past, throw a bunch of mail out there and see what happens. The cost of postage and falling response rates will eventually kill this approach. Until then, I suggest that advertisers insist that their direct marketing agencies provide them with these new approaches in Direct Marketing or find an agency that will. It isn’t who you mail to that counts, it is who you don’t mail to if your campaigns are going to return a respectable ROI to the client.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)